Filtek Z250

Claim 1:
Hesse D, Bonifácio CC, Mendes FM, Braga MM, Imparato JC, Raggio DP. Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2014 May 28;14:58.

Dermata A, Papageorgiou SN, Fragkou S, Kotsanos N. Comparison of resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin in class II primary molar restorations: a 2-year parallel randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Dec;19(6):393-401.

Atieh M. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008 Sep;18(5):325-32.

Timur V. Melkumyan, Angela D. Dadamova, Surayo Sh. Sheralieva, Nuritdin Kh. Kamilov, Fatima Yu. Daurova. Treatment of Class II Caries Lesions with Application of Packable and Conventional Resin Composites: Clinical and Experimental Study. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2020;10(1):66-69.

Pazinatto FB, Gionordoli Neto R, Wang L, Mondelli J, Mondelli RF, Navarro MF. 56-month clinical performance of Class I and II resin composite restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 May-Jun;20(3):323-8.

Gianordoli Neto R, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 May 1;9(4):26-33.

de Andrade AK, Duarte RM, Medeiros e Silva FD, Batista AU, Lima KC, Pontual ML, Montes MA. 30-Month randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a nanofill and a nanohybrid composite. J Dent. 2011 Jan;39(1):8-15.

de Andrade AK, Duarte RM, Medeiros e Silva FD, Batista AU, Lima KC, Monteiro GQ, Montes MA. Resin composite class I restorations: a 54-month randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2014 Nov-Dec;39(6):588-94.

Oter B, Deniz K, Cehreli SB. Preliminary data on clinical performance of bulk-fill restorations in primary molars. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Nov;21(11):1484-1491.

Wilson MA, Cowan AJ, Randall RC, Crisp RJ, Wilson NH. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results. Oper Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;27(5):423-9.

Lange RT, Pfeiffer P. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):263-72.

Baracco B, Perdigão J, Cabrera E, Ceballos L. Two-year clinical performance of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations. Oper Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):591-600.

Claim 2:
Närhi TO, Tanner J, Ostela I, Narva K, Nohrström T, Tirri T, Vallittu PK. Anterior Z250 resin composite restorations: one-year evaluation of clinical performance. Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Dec;7(4):241-3.

Loguercio AD, Lorini E, Weiss RV, Tori AP, Picinatto CC, Ribeiro NR, Reis A. A 12-month clinical evaluation of composite resins in class III restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007 Feb;9(1):57-64.

Claims 3 - 6:

none found

Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

Claim 1: Direct posterior restorations
Claim 2: Direct anterior restorations
Claim 3: Core buildups
Claim 4: Splinting
Claim 5: Indirect restorations including inlays, onlays
Claim 6: Indirect restorations including veneers

•
•
•
•

.

Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0